Why do such sickening things happen?
I was waiting for it, and today it transpired in at least one report I’ve read on the Virginia Tech “massacre”. What I was anticipating was for the suspect in the hideous madness to be called a “troubled loner.” A troubled loner who gave signs galore that something upstairs had slipped a cog and trouble just might be a-brewing.
That, according to accounts, was definitely the case with Cho Seung-Hui, who is believed to have been the perpetrator of the largest act of academic terrorism thus far in history. All the signs were there, reports indicate, including creative writing exercises in which he decried the “debauchery” on campus, railed against rich kids, suffered a grievous sense of rejection, and showed all the trappings of the wack-jobs at Columbine, Montreal and everywhere else such bits of hideousness have taken place.
Cho had been referred to the school’s counselling services, but it’s unclear what was recommended. But, in light of commentaries from those who knew him, it becomes agonizingly clear that he had a fuse that was burning down rapidly and that he should have been removed from the campus at any of those hints.
I’m neither psychiatrist nor psychologist, so I’ll leave such matters up to the experts like Drs. Serani and Tempest, both of whom we’re privileged to have as fellow bloggers, and Dr. Deb has some good insights and references in her blog of today, but I can only say that the mental meanderings of those who would do such a thing go beyond any speculation I can offer here.
FBI profiling expert, John Douglas, in The Anatomy of Motive offers some insights into the mental workings of the mass murderer, which Cho is alleged to have been, and Douglas points out that the mass murderer is a different breed of cat from a serial killer or a spree killer, and certainly different from an assassin, who has a specific target in mind. At the same time, however, we are still left with the question ‘why?’ A profiler can suss out ‘who’ they guy is (and it’s invariably a male), but to me they don’t come close to addressing why somebody does such a ghastly thing.
The point is, the huge majority of us would never dream of taking a life. We might be called upon to do so if we are combat soldiers or law enforcement officers, but to take a life, even in the line of duty, is agonizing, even for the most hardened.
Sure, we’ve all been enraged. We’ve even thought “I could kill him or her for doing that,” but we would never do so. During a very stressful time of my life, following the break-up of a marriage, I was asked by a counsellor I was seeing if I felt suicidal. I responded in the negative. The thought hadn’t even crossed my mind. He then asked, which surprised me, if I felt homicidal. “Good God, no!” was my immediate response. No matter how angry I had been in the preceding weeks, such a thought literally never entered my consciousness. “I had to check,” he responded.
Sometimes I’ve thought that if somebody were to threaten my wife or child, I could take their life in terms of protecting my nearest and dearest. I say that. I don’t really know if I could. I’d want to, but I still don’t know if I could.
This is a rambling offering because such human tragedies send the mind in many directions.
That, according to accounts, was definitely the case with Cho Seung-Hui, who is believed to have been the perpetrator of the largest act of academic terrorism thus far in history. All the signs were there, reports indicate, including creative writing exercises in which he decried the “debauchery” on campus, railed against rich kids, suffered a grievous sense of rejection, and showed all the trappings of the wack-jobs at Columbine, Montreal and everywhere else such bits of hideousness have taken place.
Cho had been referred to the school’s counselling services, but it’s unclear what was recommended. But, in light of commentaries from those who knew him, it becomes agonizingly clear that he had a fuse that was burning down rapidly and that he should have been removed from the campus at any of those hints.
I’m neither psychiatrist nor psychologist, so I’ll leave such matters up to the experts like Drs. Serani and Tempest, both of whom we’re privileged to have as fellow bloggers, and Dr. Deb has some good insights and references in her blog of today, but I can only say that the mental meanderings of those who would do such a thing go beyond any speculation I can offer here.
FBI profiling expert, John Douglas, in The Anatomy of Motive offers some insights into the mental workings of the mass murderer, which Cho is alleged to have been, and Douglas points out that the mass murderer is a different breed of cat from a serial killer or a spree killer, and certainly different from an assassin, who has a specific target in mind. At the same time, however, we are still left with the question ‘why?’ A profiler can suss out ‘who’ they guy is (and it’s invariably a male), but to me they don’t come close to addressing why somebody does such a ghastly thing.
The point is, the huge majority of us would never dream of taking a life. We might be called upon to do so if we are combat soldiers or law enforcement officers, but to take a life, even in the line of duty, is agonizing, even for the most hardened.
Sure, we’ve all been enraged. We’ve even thought “I could kill him or her for doing that,” but we would never do so. During a very stressful time of my life, following the break-up of a marriage, I was asked by a counsellor I was seeing if I felt suicidal. I responded in the negative. The thought hadn’t even crossed my mind. He then asked, which surprised me, if I felt homicidal. “Good God, no!” was my immediate response. No matter how angry I had been in the preceding weeks, such a thought literally never entered my consciousness. “I had to check,” he responded.
Sometimes I’ve thought that if somebody were to threaten my wife or child, I could take their life in terms of protecting my nearest and dearest. I say that. I don’t really know if I could. I’d want to, but I still don’t know if I could.
This is a rambling offering because such human tragedies send the mind in many directions.
Labels: mass murder, what is the 'why?'
8 Comments:
Hey Ian,
Great post. Douglas' "Mind Hunters" is another good read as are these by J. Reid Melroy -
"The Psychopathic Mind"
and
"Violent Attachments"
I believe that this student demonstrated very serious behaviors prior to this tragedy. Firesetting, stalking, disclosures in writings and a referral to the counseling center was made. What happened? The serious escalations of his behaviors should have warranted arrest or hospitalization in my opinion.
The worry I have for those with psychiatric conditions, psychological problems or mental illness is that the ugly head of stigma will rise higher and take an unworthy place in society. Most with mental illness never become violent or aggressive. Those who kill have a set of frail coping mechanisms, pathological defenses and little empathy or compassion just to name a few.
I am stoping my rambling now too. It's amazing to see how fast my fingers can type when being so emotional!!!
Peace,
Deb
Thank you so much for this, Deb. Your comments and wisdom are always appreciated and valued.
Peace to you, too.
Ian
I found it interesting that when he made his gun purchase, a background check revealed no red flags. It makes one contemplate the calls for more gun control...if any of the victims had a weapon, could lives have been saved? Who knows...I think that even those who knew this young man was exibiting signs of psycho-pathology (is that a word?) most likely they would have been in denial, "He's messed up, but it'll probably work itself out..." I doubt anyone could have anticipated this...not even two hours after the first shots rang out, apparently.
How very sad...
No matter that gun advocates that it's not the gun that kills but the person behind it, if the person behind the gun did not have access to said gun there would have been much less carnage. Do we really need guns in our society? The killer at Dawson College or École Polytechinique (I refuse to acknowledge them, let them stay in limbo) had more firepower than the police. Is there really a need to be selling semi-automatic military style weapons or pistols of any caliber? I know people want to hunt, well if a hunter can't hunt with a single action bolt rifle with a limited magazine, he shouldn't be allowed in the woods, he's not a good enough shot. Best of all would be to ban all weapons but that isn't about to happen unfortunately, so we'll get more of these killing sprees. My heart goes out to the families and the survivors, such a waste.
One wonders how many more senseless tragedies will occur before the world wakes up and takes some serious action. As Dr. deb said the clues were so blatantly there so why was no action taken to remove him period and give him the help he so desperately needed. Does one have to kill before receiving help? Society needs to prioritize its values to ensure this kind of thing never happens again and provide help where help is most needed.
Good post Ian.
Yes, being a loner is no excuse, there are many out in the world struggling with personal problems.
I appreciated Dr Deb's insights too. I wonder what the killer's family is like, he must have had an unhappy background. Did you read that one-act play he wrote, (the link was on my post today) full of hatred and a lust for killing?
I never know what to say in cases like this. What can be done about it, short of much more stringent gun control? (As BB says, who needs a semi-automatic or automatic rifle in our society?).
I can't help thnking though, that you can offer help, but not force it on a person. I'm afraid, in the wake of messes like this one, that people with mental illnesses will be even more stigmatized than they are today.
Hmmm, something we'll all be questioning for a long time.
I wonder if the red flags have become so obvious only in hindsight (i.e. under investigation when all incidents were stacked together).
I have a lot more I could say but, honestly, it's so depressing. So sad for everyone involved. And I don't believe we will get any solid answers. The fact that this happened yet again, implies that America has learned nothing from Columbine or any other similar atrocity.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home