Monday, March 03, 2008

Let us 'not' compare mythologies -- OK?

I heard of a man
who says words so beautifully
that if he only speaks their name
women give themselves to him.

-Leonard Cohen

Those lines are taken from Leonard Cohen's first published book, Let Us Compare Mythologies, published in 1956. That Lennie. He hit on the idea early on (an idea that became cherished by randy and artistic undergraduates everywhere) that he could adroitly woo a woman into bed just by the power of his words.

The only fly in that ointment was, he was Lennie, the rest were just undergrads.

And, Leonard Cohen’s own ‘mythology’ evinces his consummate success with the opposite sex. Of course it helped that he was dashing, charming, intelligent and immensely talented. I once saw a ballet performance of his poem ‘You Have the Lovers’, performed by the Royal Winnipeg Ballet, and I must say that it was one of the most erotic things I’ve ever seen. Yes, Len was a master of his craft.

But, I am not here to discuss Leonard Cohen and his cocksman prowess, what I want to consider is the whole idea of mythology – personal mythology.

We all have ourselves – and we all have our mythology. Rarely does the twain meet in real life. They only meet when we try to impact others. Or, sometimes the others know us only by our mythology, and have no inkling about the real us – the sort of bread-and-butter, or blood-and-guts us. Our spouses or lovers probably think they know the real us just because they’ve heard us fart, but that means little. It still is a matter of they only know what we let them know.

If we are emotionally healthy, we ‘know’ the truth about ourselves, as opposed to the myth, despite how much we might use the myth to perpetuate an image within the outer world, especially if we are trying to impress some individual in that outer world.

There are pitfalls in this. We fall in love with and sometimes marry somebody because we’ve fallen for an image: an image of beauty, grace and charm. Our opposite number has done the same thing. But, when we get in close quarters we find that this vision of grace also snores, shaves her legs, leaves her dirty underwear lying around, and is even susceptible to the odd bout of diarrhea. If the love was one with the ‘real’ person, such human elements are never problematic. If the love was with the myth, the relationship can be rent asunder.

There is a worse scenario, and that is one that becomes apparent with much regularity in our ‘star-fucking’ society, and that is when the myth and reality become confused within the individual. Then it can turn ugly. If a person receives accolades enough for some accomplishment or other he or she can come to believe their own legends. Then hubris becomes the dominant factor in their lives.

Some fine people walk the planet, blessedly, but there are no ‘gods’ striding amongst us, as much as we’re deluded into thinking there are. And we are so deluded, or else politicians, actors, athletes and so forth would have no careers.

In some cases such individuals go over the top with narcissism that is based solely on myth. A few cases in point:

Conrad Black: Disgraced media czar Conrad is off to begin six years in prison today. He honestly didn’t believe that ‘his’ life would come to such a pass. He was, after all, ‘Lord Black’ who broke bread with the world’s rich and powerful. Now he’s in a four-by-eight cell.

Oprah Winfrey: Believes she has the right to make and/or break the careers of such talented writers as Jonathan Franzen who ‘dared’ to not play the Oprah Game. She also starts a much-vaunted school in South Africa, which turned out to be only a school for ‘her sort’, not for the sad urchins in the mud-hut villages. Oprah gives away cars, but she doesn’t give them away to the ghetto-bound.

Brangelina: A couple of B-grade actors who stride the world like colossi in context of their ‘good works.’ Good works that have been carried out from dirty trenches (not the nearest air-conditioned hotel) by thousands of good people for decades who earn no international ass-kissing.

And so it goes. Maybe our individual myths keep us from crying out from fear and loneliness in the middle of the night. But, perhaps in understanding the dichotomy between myth and reality, we can actually subscribe to a little happiness in having a smattering of self-knowledge.

Labels:

21 Comments:

Blogger Ellee Seymour said...

It's sometimes easier to turn a blind eye to personal difficulties, rather than facing a life of loneliness. I think we all fool ourselves from time to time.

10:22 AM  
Blogger Tai said...

Joseph Campbell suddenly springs to mind.
As does Jung.

What an interesting post...gives me something to think about this rainy day.

10:40 AM  
Blogger andrea said...

This is a particularly good one, Ian. (And since it's words, will you marry me? :) As the daughter of a man who has never had any concept of where the line between his reality and his intricately-crafted mythology is, it took me longer than most to discover where my own was.

12:06 PM  
Blogger Ian Lidster said...

Of course I'll marry you, Andrea. Thought you'd never asked. How should we explain this to our other halves, however?

12:57 PM  
Blogger Ian Lidster said...

That should have read 'ask', needless to say.

12:57 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I often ponder the notion of "self". Am I the person I know that I am or the one that others perceive me to be? And how different are these two or more selves?

I go to great lengths to preserve my "real" self, to keep others away from it - because then they can never hurt me but then again maybe it means they can never truly love me either? But I find that having a very brave mythical self enables me to do all those things that would scare the real me stiff - standing up in lecture halls and things - without panicking at all and it also once enabled me to cope with something very horrible that happened to me.

Oh this is rather deep thinking for a Monday evening. It's making me feel all schizophrenic.

1:10 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Hi Ian, I came over from andrea's blog, curious. I had fun reading your post and also find it very interesting. Yes, we (and the people we get involved with) often are victims of "projection", but I guess we learn from it. At least I hope so. I also like the last bit of your post about famous people's narcism:)
Have a wonderful week
greetings from Paris
andrea

2:08 PM  
Blogger dinahmow said...

Ian, this is fine for your readership, but , should some of these self-styled gods read it, would they understand the last paragraph?Words like dichotomy may be beyond their narcissistic grasp!

2:52 PM  
Blogger Big Brother said...

When you start to believe your own myths then you're in trouble... Connie Black is a good example, hubris will do it to you every time.

3:11 PM  
Blogger Vic said...

I wonder, Ian, just how many are "emotionally healthy" acording to your definition. I suspect we all have many layers of "myth" rather than one, of which some we become aware, but do we really know the naked, "unstoried" person inside? Even describing ourselves by our profession (as I note even you do in your profile!!) is just a story, a convenient way to put a simple label, rather than describing the real person. It is a scary process to dig beneath the many layers, ignore the history that actually doesn't define us, and find out what we really are.

And as for the cult of the heroic mythic celebrity, which is swallowed whole by the protagonists themselves ... The world would have a chance to be a better place if all "E" shows were deleted. Of course, we only get what we really want, so maybe their proliferation says a lot about the state of the world.

3:12 PM  
Blogger meggie said...

Another great post! I ponder the fate of some of the 'sporting greats' who believe their own myths & legends, & completely lose the plot.
I think we all know people who seem more authentic than others.There are even some actors who appear to keep their feet of clay, but still ply their craft.

3:42 PM  
Blogger jmb said...

Interesting post Ian. Quite the wordsmith is Lennie. Can't sing however, luckily others can and do sing his wonderful songs.

6:08 PM  
Blogger Hermes said...

And yet, there are times when we need that mythology. On a particularly hard day, when I know something really difficult has to be done, I have to be Superman when I get up in the morning. If I can't step into those red booties in my mind and believe that I can do it, I won't be able to do it. But celebrity is another matter and I'm with you. Bono gives me a rash. Remember when he endorsed the Liberal Party of Canada? He's not even a citizen!

8:23 PM  
Blogger Janice Thomson said...

Even those of supposedly great faith hide their real selves. Mother Teresa for 66 years hid from the public the fact she could not in fact see or feel God's presence. She has now been 'beautified' on the way to 'sainthood'. Some claim she was in what is commonly known as 'the dark night of the soul.' Having studied and gone through this myself I don't feel this was happening to her. However I most certainly could be wrong. The point is she hid this extremely important side of herself - (considering what she was was doing i.e. praying for others) - yet is being made a saint. One wonders what the qualifications for sainthood really are.

8:53 PM  
Blogger geewits said...

I don't know. I personally am a fan of people who have been mythologized like Judy Garland and Marilyn Monroe. I like thinking of their tragedies and successes and prefer that to thinking of them as people who maybe did not brush their teeth often enough or wash their hands after using the washroom. And don't most writerly types, like yourself, do the same thing with Hemmingway?

10:11 PM  
Blogger Casdok said...

An interesting post, i will now go away with thoughts of Get off my lawn in red pants!

2:56 AM  
Blogger laughingwolf said...

i'm with you on most points, ian... especially on the 'personalities' you mention, starting with conrad black

you forgot to mention, winfrey gives away no cars of her own, only those of manufacturers who blindly believe in doing so she's 'doing good'... she's a mile wide and one micrometer deep... as always, it's about IMAGE

4:38 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A) This is a good argument forliving with someone before you get married, so you stand a good chnace of marrying a human ratehr than an image.

B) I've actually been thinking about this issue of self-image, particualrly since a bit of an argument Saturday. It's impossible to to get caught up in it a least partially, and yet people who are absorbed in their idea of their image have to put so much energey into maintaining it that they aren't able to live a genuine life.

4:58 AM  
Blogger Jazz said...

What is it they say about Karma rearing its ugly head and biting you in the ass?

Black has been bit.

Now if only the Brangelina (who have to be two of the most annoying people on the planet) and Oprah myth could be punctured too.

11:40 AM  
Blogger Tanya Brown said...

Great post. It echoed and clarified something my husband often tells me about people being devoted to a narrative, a story, at the expense of facts.

1:48 PM  
Blogger Rositta said...

He's a poet and yes he is charming and handsome and was always thus. I used to listen to him in the smokey coffee houses in Montreal. The rest on your list, could not care less...ciao

2:48 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home