Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Cuba Libre -- or, Fidel-dee-dee?


It has always struck me as odd and highly inconsistent how certain Canadians of decidedly left-wing principles love to take vacations in Cuba. I am not of their political persuasion and I tend to not want to luxuriate in the tropical beaches of a police state. Not as long as I am aware of the suffering of many folk in that socialist ‘paradise.’

I once said to an individual who was going on ad nauseam about how wonderful was their family vacation in Cuba, and how inexpensive it was. “Of course it’s inexpensive, you stupid fuck,” is what I thought. “The people there only earn a dollar a day!” No, I didn’t say that, but I did ask, “Don’t you ever wonder about exploiting people doing dog-work for a pittance so you can have a cheap vacation?”

Anyway, I’ve never chosen to spend my money to enhance the coffers of a nasty little dictatorship. I’m just not very big on tyrants.

Such thoughts come to mind with the new of the denouement of Fidel Castro as Cuban strongman after a half-century of wielding the reins of power. He’s a tired and haggard looking old man. A huge contrast to the dashing young guerrilla who entered Havana triumphantly shortly after New Year’s Day in 1959.This was after enduring a brutal life in the Sierra Maestre Mountains since 1955.

The entry was the culmination of a vicious four-year battle to liberate the country from unsavoury dictator Fulgencio Battista. And everybody loved the dash and flair of this swaggering, yet charming man who seemed to herald a new era. Yes, there was Fidel, and the charismatic Che – his dashing and romantic henchman who, despite retro and stupid lionization of the bastard, was a brutish psycho who was an extremely risky compadre for Fidel. Fidel was smart enough to know that and sent him off overseas to foment further revolution. In so fomenting, he got shot. Fidel probably didn't mourn so very much. And, there was little brother Raul. Raul, whom nobody heard much about post-1959, but was always there. And now he is to be boss. Hmm. Some argue that Raul has more to be ashamed of in the brutality and repression departments than does Fidel.

Anyway, they all marched triumphantly in, and everybody thought Fidel was so cool. Especially young people. Somewhere around the place I have an old poster distributed by some leftie cabal called the ‘Hands Off Cuba Committee.’ I was a kid. I stuck it up on the wall. My old man ordered me to take it down, and opined that he wasn’t going to have “that communist crap” covering his walls.

And then we know how it played out. Fidel had the audacity to ‘nationalize’ a whole bunch of US holdings in a country that lies a scant 90 miles off the coast of Florida. That did not go well. After all, there were huge ‘connections’ between the US and Cuba – all the way from Ernest Hemingway and his love of the place, to old Joe Kennedy, of whom it was once said that he owned half the whorehouses in Havana, to those fine cigars, to the Cubans’ love for Coca Cola. And, hey, Fidel was a dab-hand at America’s national sport, baseball, and was once considered a contender to make it into the majors should he have chosen to go in that direction.

But, he had other plans and in relatively short order he, in his anti-Americanism, embraced the other guys and hugged N.S. Kruschev. Bad move, and there was all sorts of ill blood since that time. Some of it stupid, like the Bay of Pigs, and some of it terrifying, like the Missile Crisis that brought us to the brink of World War III. That was a wide-awake moment in time.

Meanwhile, there were the exiles, and there were the stories of the notorious political prisons, and there was the reality that Cubans, despite a fine nationalized health system, still toil for a buck a day and the richest people in the place are the hookers and cabbies that get to lay their hands on tourist bucks. Tourists, including Americans, who filter into the place via Toronto.

And now he is gone. Oh, he’s still breathing, they say. But, he’s effectively left the building.

A lot of promise. Not much follow-through. I, for one, won’t miss him.


Labels:

13 Comments:

Blogger Janice Thomson said...

It is good he is finally gone but on the other hand it doesn't look like anyone else will be offering any improvement for the people of that nation. I quite agree a vacation in a country like this is not something I could go to bed feeling good about.

8:35 AM  
Blogger Jazz said...

Che didn't get himself killed for nothing... The other day I saw a teenager wearing a bright pink t-shirt imprinted with the face of Che and beneath it, crossbones, all done in glitter. The mind boggles. I doubt she even knew who he was...

As for vacations, personally I've never been there, but I think if you vacation in pretty well any third world country you're exploiting someone, whether you,re in the Dominican Republic or Vietnam or Bali.

8:54 AM  
Blogger laughingwolf said...

raul may make a change, here or there, but i'm not holding my breath it'll help the lives of the majority! :(

9:31 AM  
Blogger kimber said...

"...charismatic Che – his charismatic henchman who, despite retro and stupid lionization of the bastard, was a brutish psycho..."

I've often seen Che's image on expensive fashion t-shirts and silently marvelled at the human capacity for credulity.

10:02 AM  
Blogger geewits said...

Good for you. In reading about all this recently I came across an article about the rich Canadian tourism business there. I have to say I was shocked and disappointed. You guys all seem so intelligent. I thought, "WHY?! Why would they vacation there?" I'm glad you were not one of them (and Jazz, too, I see). Thanks for a great read. I felt like I was reading a magazine.

11:27 AM  
Blogger Dita said...

Hurrah for greater causes. Stay true to that integrity for it's certain to pay off.

I found it ironic that elections were being held, yet Fidel's brother is taking over the reigns. Wait, I'm confused...aren't we all.

11:47 AM  
Blogger Jazz said...

To Geewits: I'm sure Americans would go to Cuba en masse for cheap vacations if there was no embargo. People want as much as they can get for their dollar - whether that translates as Walmart or vacations in Cuba.

I've travelled to several poor countries (Mexico Ecuador, The Dominican Republic, Nepal, Indonesia, Vietnam....) and to some extent I exploited people just by setting foot there. Did I feel bad sometimes? Yes. Did I have a good time? Yes again.

Right now there's a whole thing about Myanmar. Two schools of thought: by going you are helping to prop up a brutal regime - or, by going there you might get some much needed currency to a few of the people.

Which is the right attitude? I don't know, I have no answers, but I think it's much more complicated than, "You're a prick if you go somewhere ruled by a dictator" Geez, there might actually be a blog post in this (LOL).

1:42 PM  
Blogger meggie said...

We have just been discussing the fact that we wonder what the future will be for that unfortunate people.

2:12 PM  
Blogger jmb said...

I'm sure it's more of the same until Raul is also gone. What happens then I wonder?

10:06 PM  
Blogger geewits said...

Jazz, it has nothing to do with an embargo. As Americans we are raised to be anti-communism. Cuba is a communist country. We do take vacations in poor places - mainly Mexico - and we shower the locals with cash. A lady selling roses came by our cafe table in Puerta Vallarta and I picked out a lovely rose. My Dad gave her a $100 bill. She tried to give us her whole supply of roses and we refused them. Dictator or no, Cuba is a communist country with no freedom of speech, elections, etc. Mexico is a democratic country, as is the Dominican Republic. Just sayin'.

10:32 PM  
Blogger Tanya Brown said...

Thanks for an interesting article - alas, I have nothing of interest to contribute to the discussion.

Oh. I do agree with Jazz, though, that if there was no embargo, people would be flocking down to Cuba for cheap vacations. People as ethical as Geewits are few and far between, I fear.

3:38 PM  
Blogger heartinsanfrancisco said...

As you may know from reading my blog, I was in Cuba when Castro came to power. And things looked good - for a few days.

They haven't looked good there since.

I agree that vacationing in a place whose citizens do not earn a living wage is quite distasteful.

Sadly, it doesn't seem as if things will change for the Cuban people until Raul is gone, too.

7:24 PM  
Blogger Rositta said...

I went there once, I wanted to see. 95 percent of the tourists were Canadian and 5 percent from Europe. I have always been of the opinion if Canadians stopped going for one year there might be change. On the other hand the Cuban people don't have the will to free themselves and I always figured if the Poles and East Germans could do it why can't they...ciao

8:01 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home