Hostelries can be hostile
The current vogue is to refer to upscale hostelries as ‘boutique’ hotels, giving the desperate-to-impress traveler visions of shopping on Rodeo Drive or some other equally posh Mecca of extravagance. The word boutique is simply French for small store, or department within a larger store, but it exudes, in translation at least, a hint of having arrived. Something very important to arrivees. ‘Arrivee’, by the way, is French for pretentious bastard with more money than sense.
A few years ago hotels and motels (which used to be called auto-courts until the owners of such decided the term was a little too reminiscent of images of the Joad family making their way to ‘Californy’) came to be called ‘inns’. Actually there are still a lot of inns around. Most of the places that aren’t boutique hotels still stick with the nomenclature.
I expect the idea of co-opting the world inn was to give the impression that this was something of a cozy Dickensian hostelry, rather than a heartless steel and glass tower. However, if you study authentic Dickensian inns, you would find the heartless tower much more agreeable. But, the Dickensian of myth suggests goose-down duvets, brass bedsteads, and copper bedwarmers, and a crackling fire right within the room. The décor wallpaper and duvet cover would be, of course, Laura Ashley with an unremitting vengeance.
But, I say call hotels, motels, or flophouses what you will, they are ultimately just places that for a certain paid sum, one can hit the sack and hope for a reasonable night’s sleep, without being too distracted by noisy guests in adjoining rooms, drunks in the corridor, sirens in the streets, screams in the streets, or developing obsessive thoughts about just how stained the mattress might be beneath all this seemingly spotless linen. Oh, and why should items in the mini-bar cost more than a case of the stuff in a liquor store?
Regardless of such concerns, I have generally enjoyed the places I have stayed in over the years. I have put my feet up in many North American hostelries, as well as throughout the United Kingdom, Europe, Hawaii, and the South Pacific. They haven’t all been splendid, and many were far from luxurious, but they fulfilled the function they were called upon to fulfill at the time. And, my demands are few. So are my personal caveats. I shy away from places with cute names like Bide-a-Wee, and I want no truck with a place that calls itself ‘Kozy’ anything. People who substitute a K for a word that should have a C are either excruciatingly twee, illiterate, or raging international Trotskyites. Not to be trusted, any of them.
The less expensive rooms of my experience are basically cookie-cutter in accoutrements. They all generally have the same chenille bedspread, with the only variation being in color, as long as those colors are pink, white or beige. They will also have the same vinyl headboard, simulated wood desk; orange, yellow and brown curtains that invariably fail to keep out the flashing neon light of the bowling alley across the street. There will also be a few questionable, though not horrific, stains on the carpet. Oh, and there will be a fake oil painting of a quaint bucolic scene bolted to the wall. As if anybody would actually steal one of those hideous things. Oh, and a TV. A TV for which the remote, as often as not, won’t work.
Each time I enter a new room I follow a basic routine. My first stop is the bathroom, sometimes out of necessity, but more usually out of curiosity. I flush to make sure the mechanism on the john works. I regard the bathtub, usually with certain dismay, since they are invariably midget-sized. I scrutinize the toiletries, the little shampoos and soaps just to see if they will be worthwhile pilfering. There is always a shower cap. I imagine few shower caps get ripped off.
My next stop is that aforementioned television. Have you ever noticed that motel and hotel TVs are often some obscure brand like ‘Eddie’s?’ Expensive rooms have big flat screen top-end sets that make one feel a bit cheated upon returning to the crappy and archaic home TV. Cheap rooms are better in that regard because you don’t suffer TV envy when the vacation or business trip is over. A lot of hotel/motel TVs have extra-cost cable connections that will bring you relatively recent motion pictures or sleazy porn right to your own home-away-from-home. Some sort of a nod to contemporary mores, more for the lonely commercial traveller than anyone else, I suspect.
I never really bother much with the ‘in case of fire’ escape routes. If there is a fire, I am going to be in such a blind panic that I won’t remember the diagram, in any case. I just know one rule, therein: Don’t take the damn elevator!
Mini-bar equals rip-off. Designed only for those too lazy or afraid to go down to the lounge, or for those who were silly enough to no bring their own supply at a fraction of the cost, or for alcoholics who have finished all their own stuff and who are still not ready to call it a night. Lushes are notoriously bad planners.
As I suggested, my observations, and in some cases, caveats, apply only to the middle ground of hostelries. I have stayed in some really crummy places, rarely, and some very high end digs, equally rarely. We stayed once, at off-season rate, at a very, very posh Waikiki hotel. My basic feeling was I didn’t even want to hit the beach. I just wanted to stay in the room. It was a room that put to the lie my long-held belief that a hotel room is just a place to lay one’s head, so why pay the big bucks? I know now that if I had the big bucks on a regular basis, I would go top-drawer all the way. But, I digress.
But, even with cheaper forms of accommodation, I do have my standards. When I am paying hard-earned money to avoid sleeping rough on a park-bench or in a railway station, I expect a basic value in return for my expenditure. For example, I would never think of staying at the following places:
- A room with more than three beds. One of which seems to be already occupied.
A few years ago hotels and motels (which used to be called auto-courts until the owners of such decided the term was a little too reminiscent of images of the Joad family making their way to ‘Californy’) came to be called ‘inns’. Actually there are still a lot of inns around. Most of the places that aren’t boutique hotels still stick with the nomenclature.
I expect the idea of co-opting the world inn was to give the impression that this was something of a cozy Dickensian hostelry, rather than a heartless steel and glass tower. However, if you study authentic Dickensian inns, you would find the heartless tower much more agreeable. But, the Dickensian of myth suggests goose-down duvets, brass bedsteads, and copper bedwarmers, and a crackling fire right within the room. The décor wallpaper and duvet cover would be, of course, Laura Ashley with an unremitting vengeance.
But, I say call hotels, motels, or flophouses what you will, they are ultimately just places that for a certain paid sum, one can hit the sack and hope for a reasonable night’s sleep, without being too distracted by noisy guests in adjoining rooms, drunks in the corridor, sirens in the streets, screams in the streets, or developing obsessive thoughts about just how stained the mattress might be beneath all this seemingly spotless linen. Oh, and why should items in the mini-bar cost more than a case of the stuff in a liquor store?
Regardless of such concerns, I have generally enjoyed the places I have stayed in over the years. I have put my feet up in many North American hostelries, as well as throughout the United Kingdom, Europe, Hawaii, and the South Pacific. They haven’t all been splendid, and many were far from luxurious, but they fulfilled the function they were called upon to fulfill at the time. And, my demands are few. So are my personal caveats. I shy away from places with cute names like Bide-a-Wee, and I want no truck with a place that calls itself ‘Kozy’ anything. People who substitute a K for a word that should have a C are either excruciatingly twee, illiterate, or raging international Trotskyites. Not to be trusted, any of them.
The less expensive rooms of my experience are basically cookie-cutter in accoutrements. They all generally have the same chenille bedspread, with the only variation being in color, as long as those colors are pink, white or beige. They will also have the same vinyl headboard, simulated wood desk; orange, yellow and brown curtains that invariably fail to keep out the flashing neon light of the bowling alley across the street. There will also be a few questionable, though not horrific, stains on the carpet. Oh, and there will be a fake oil painting of a quaint bucolic scene bolted to the wall. As if anybody would actually steal one of those hideous things. Oh, and a TV. A TV for which the remote, as often as not, won’t work.
Each time I enter a new room I follow a basic routine. My first stop is the bathroom, sometimes out of necessity, but more usually out of curiosity. I flush to make sure the mechanism on the john works. I regard the bathtub, usually with certain dismay, since they are invariably midget-sized. I scrutinize the toiletries, the little shampoos and soaps just to see if they will be worthwhile pilfering. There is always a shower cap. I imagine few shower caps get ripped off.
My next stop is that aforementioned television. Have you ever noticed that motel and hotel TVs are often some obscure brand like ‘Eddie’s?’ Expensive rooms have big flat screen top-end sets that make one feel a bit cheated upon returning to the crappy and archaic home TV. Cheap rooms are better in that regard because you don’t suffer TV envy when the vacation or business trip is over. A lot of hotel/motel TVs have extra-cost cable connections that will bring you relatively recent motion pictures or sleazy porn right to your own home-away-from-home. Some sort of a nod to contemporary mores, more for the lonely commercial traveller than anyone else, I suspect.
I never really bother much with the ‘in case of fire’ escape routes. If there is a fire, I am going to be in such a blind panic that I won’t remember the diagram, in any case. I just know one rule, therein: Don’t take the damn elevator!
Mini-bar equals rip-off. Designed only for those too lazy or afraid to go down to the lounge, or for those who were silly enough to no bring their own supply at a fraction of the cost, or for alcoholics who have finished all their own stuff and who are still not ready to call it a night. Lushes are notoriously bad planners.
As I suggested, my observations, and in some cases, caveats, apply only to the middle ground of hostelries. I have stayed in some really crummy places, rarely, and some very high end digs, equally rarely. We stayed once, at off-season rate, at a very, very posh Waikiki hotel. My basic feeling was I didn’t even want to hit the beach. I just wanted to stay in the room. It was a room that put to the lie my long-held belief that a hotel room is just a place to lay one’s head, so why pay the big bucks? I know now that if I had the big bucks on a regular basis, I would go top-drawer all the way. But, I digress.
But, even with cheaper forms of accommodation, I do have my standards. When I am paying hard-earned money to avoid sleeping rough on a park-bench or in a railway station, I expect a basic value in return for my expenditure. For example, I would never think of staying at the following places:
- A room with more than three beds. One of which seems to be already occupied.
- A room with what looks like bullet holes in the wall.
- A room in which the door to the hallway only locks from the outside.
- A room with no window. Even if it overlooks the local stockyards, I demand a window.
- A room in which there is a gas heater that suggests ‘Use at your own risk.’
- A hotel or motel with hourly rates, with a notice saying 'Mandy' is available from 9 p.m. to midnight.
- A hotel of which the clerk at the travel agency has told you: “Well, if there’s nothing else available, we can always get you into the Buena Vista. You do not want the Buena Vista, believe me.
- A hotel of which, when the address is given, causes a cabbie to shake his head with dismay and cross himself.
- A hotel that asks you to leave the names of next-of-kin when registering.
- A hotel in which the fire-charred areas above the windows have been inadequately covered by cheap paint.
So, maybe before you begin your next vacation, you might want to take this guide with you. Just some of the stuff they don't tell you on Expedia.com.
Labels: travelers' woes, Vacation caveat
14 Comments:
The cheapest "hotel" I ever stayed at cost the equivalent of 90 cents. The toilet was a shack with a concrete hole, the bath facilities consisted of a bucket of steaming water delivered by the smiling owner. But the sheets were spotless, and the view of Nepal's Himalaya mountains was a hundred times better than any flat screen T.V. But I have to admit, I have very occasionally stayed at some pretty fancy digs, and I could sooo get used to it!
V.
I think I stayed at the same place as V... But then such countries demand elasticity in one's requirements. I've stayed in some "interesting" hotel rooms like the one in Ecuador where hot water for the shower was obtained by moving a live wire under the flow of water. I kid you not. The water was lukewarm at best.
The one thing I really really need in a hotel room (in Europe or North America that is) is a fridge. I need a place to chill that bottle of white wine or bubbly Mr. Jazz and I will drink in the evening...
A great piece! I wish I'd written it. May I suggest an addition to your list of places to avoid? Any motel where "working girls" are conducting their business in the parking lot, doubly so if they proposition you before you can even rent a room.
voyager's comments made me laugh. if water doesn't come out of the shower head, forget it. my "home away from home" has to be nice. i take my own sheets and towels with me. there was one incident when i went to chicago 4 yrs ago with a friend, who was traveling for her job. the room had little spiders and we had to call the exterminator late at nite. my friend was too tired to move to another room they wanted to give us, so we ended up staying. i didn't sleep too well that nite watching for spiders. they did give us a complimentary buffet breakfast. BIG DEAL!
Lot to be said for a tent.
My sister and I stayed in a very suspect "Inn" this summer ... your "bullet holes in the wall" reminded me of it!
It was not very comfortable but it was definitely an education!
good advice, ian... and tanya!
Enjoyed this post! Having travelled a little, & run such establishments ourselves both sides are known to me.
Never stay at an Establishment known as "Springfield" anythiing. We wondered why the Customs Staff were sniggering...
We duly found out, slept-in linen, cockroaches in the cupboards, drunks lurching about demanding handouts..No one to greet us- we just took our room keys off a board, when the drunk let us in the front door!
We took our bags & left! Waited till we returned home to demand refunds for our prepaid stay.
Stayed in really basic huts in Thailand, but they were clean, & were moored on a river- it was fun, for 2 nights.
When I first started travelling I didn't mind staying in those kinds of hostels where you had 16 room-mates in your dormitory-style bunk-house, late-night shenanigans in the halls, and the kind of shpwers you really REALLY should wear some form of footwear in.
I think I even had some sort of smugness that I wasn't "wasting" my meagre budget on a room where (I rationalized) I'd barely be in except for sleeping.
But I have to admit that as the years went by and my budget allowed, I am much more appreciative of the simple joys of a lock on the bedroom door,a private bathroom, complimentary anything. Oh, and jacuzzis are also nice...
Those tips are too late for most of us by the looks of things. We have all found our own no-no places.
I once stayed at a motel in BC for $7.50 a night, in 1961 mind you. It was very shabby but clean and the owners were lovely people. We were rock hounding at the time and it was a step-up from tenting, but not too much.
Your statement:
Lushes are notoriously bad planners.
Sent me into a fit of laughter that injured a lot of the areas around my lungs.
You know I've already posted that I like the 5 star rooms. I don't like the chains so much, I like the hotels with history (although some of the chains have bought them). My favorites are The Willard, The Arlington, La Mansion, The St. Francis, Hotel Monteleone and the Soho Grand. Yeah, some of these were bought by the big chains, but the buildings are historic and well-preserved. And the only Mandy they have brings your eggs benedict.
(And bullet holes would be expected at The Arlington, which was a favorite hangout for Al Capone.)
I had tried to leave a huge long comment, but blogger ate it.
Both the best and the worst hotels I've stayed in where in Vancouver.
One had a room larger than my apartment (the Gold Suite in the Hotel Vancouver) and the other, rust coloured stains in the bathroom sink (and I don't think it was rust, if you catch my drift) and noises like murder in the hallways. (I don't even remember if that place had a name.)
Hotel rooms. They can sure create an impression!
Ian, I laughed through this whole post. You are a funny, funny man.
My worst hotel memory: A place in Independence, Missouri, in which the clerk sprinted ahead of us with an air freshener bottle to squirt in the room before we got to it.
Our would-be neighbor had his face pressed against the screen, staring blankly at us -- who knows what homicidal thoughts might have been coalescing in his brain.
We did not register.
We peeled out of the parking lot as fast as we could get into the car, leaving the clerk standing there forlornly with her squirt bottle.
The worst place I was ever in was a place across the border...there were cockroaches in the dam bathroom - I was a kid and had the flu so we stayed there anyway.
The best place was a small bed and breakfast where the most loveliest of couples attended our every need and included scrumptious homemade meals to boot! I loved that place.
But those are all the fun rooms! lol
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home