Saturday, April 29, 2006

I told you, I just said "No!"

Human sexuality has become entirely too complicated for my liking. While it is well we have grown sufficiently in tolerance that we accept those of other persuasions and other predilections. So, we make space for heterosexuals, homosexuals, bisexuals, transsexuals, and all the people who like to indulge in acts that range from the charming and sensual, to the bizarre, to the downright icky. That's OK, though. Consenting adults and all that. I know I have no concerns with virtually anything done by consenting adults, as long as it makes them happy and hauls their ashes.

But, according to British psychosexual studies, there is a group that maybe some of us were not aware of, and those who devote their lives (and governmental grants) to making findings, feel it is time that we accommodated those of no sexual preferences whatsoever. That is, the group within the general population that has absolutely and utterly no interest whatsoever, regardless of the circumstances, in sex. Yes, it would be a cheap shot to suggest I once dated this person, but what the heck. But, seriously, they have found a group in society that has never had sex, has never hankered after sexual congress, and has not only virtually, but literally no libido whatsoever. Those same scientists (who I suspect look remarkably like the science nerd on The Simpsons) are so involved in this study that they believe it is only fair that these people, like homosexuals, heterosexuals, metrosexuals, transsexuals, etc. deserve their own category -- nonsexuals.
How weird is that?, as Einstein was often purported to have uttered. And, just how many people are we talking about who have never had an attack of the horny vapors. Evidently somewhere in the realm of 1.05 percent of the population. Not exactly stunning numbers, but if you multiply by populations of assorted place, it does make for a goodly, if not necessarily enchanting, crowd. For example, the US has a population of 295 million, and that means that there are around 3 million folks who are 'not' going to get too friendly with your spouse late in the evening at a party, if male, they are 'not' going to think all the girls in the bar are looking better at closing time. In fact, they are not going to care what the girls (or the boys) look like. They're just not interested.
I suppose there are advantages to being in that uncharmed 1.05 percent. You never have to worry about looking your best, since you are not trying to attract anyone. You never have to wonder, if single, who you are going to be with on a Saturday night. You never have to worry about unwanted pregnancy, STD transmission, or having to launder the sheets 'yet again this week.' One woman in Edmonton was reported to have said she has thoroughly enjoyed never having been aroused by anybody at any time, because this has left her life so uncomplicated and enabled her to get on with important things. What important things? Oh, I'm sorry. I guess I just cheapened myself by writing that.
All I can say in conclusion is chacun a son gout, I suppose. But, I must also be thankful that I am in the 99.95 per cent group, despite the number of complications in the old 'coupling' field I've had to deal with in my life.

So, bearing that in mind, and knowing that May 1 is on the immediate horizon, I leave you all with an authentic bit of Canadian doggerel:

Hooray-hooray. It's the first of May. Outdoor screwing starts today!

9 Comments:

Blogger Tai said...

"What important things?"

HA!



But, uh, seriously...WHAT important things???

5:36 PM  
Blogger dragonflyfilly said...

Hi ian, thanks for the words of encouragement...just as well the "heart" is maliable (sp?) -- actually i did a rough sketch in 1997 of how it felt...i have added to, and improved on it over the years, and finally, yesterday, i completed how i think my heart has healed...i will be posting the photo and commentary soon.

anyone seen the eagles lately?

re your post: interesting...day before yesterday i made some rough notes, as this is a topic that i am very interested in...and i am not surprised at all that there is a group of, i think they are termed, "asexual" (i might be wrong) individuals...and, given the current trends around sexuality, i think it would probably be quite nice to be that way, certainly it would make life a great deal less complicated...as sex, and things sexual do seem to create an awful lot of havoc...

what I find quite weird and sometimes disconcerting is the intense interest that some people have in everyone else's sex lives, this i think is an alltogether different and puzzling perversion, because people think it is entirely acceptable to wonder about what their neighbours are doing in the privacy of their own homes, if you know what i mean....

but i disagree on the libido, i would be curious to know how they are measuring that. Just because people are not sexual or sexually active, how does that prove they have no libido. Sexual activity is just one manifestation of libido, doesn't great art, or gigantic and amazing scientific discoveries spring forth from the libido? - that was my understanding of it...people who have not transcended their animalistic baser drive are stuck in the sex thing, while people who have transcended it are using their libido for more than merely sexual self-gratification...i think...???

hmmmm...enuf...back to my books...lol
cheers,
pj

7:16 PM  
Blogger dragonflyfilly said...

p.s. you have gout? better see a Dr. about that, i hear it can lead to more serious stuff....

1st of May? oh YAY, i LOVE the first of may...and all that goes with it, doggerel or no...*chuckle*

'specially the May Pole, with all the shiney coloured ribbons...i want to have a May Day party one year soon.

7:19 PM  
Blogger AlieMalie said...

interesting post, Ian. to be completely honest, i think that we're trying to scientifically classify far too many things - eventually what it comes down to is that every person is a complete individual.

geez, i feel bad when i come to comment on your posts because they're all so great and they make me think but the fact is that my brain is so warped at the moment that i can't seem to put anything intelligent into words in response. i promise i'll be better in two weeks.

:)
AM

8:06 PM  
Blogger Jo said...

Hi, Whiskey. I just know I am going to sit down at my desk on the 1st of May and burst out laughing, and no one will know why. But... it's so true...! I grew up on Vancouver Island, so I know it's true :-)

(I do not belong to that sad little 1.05%)

I did know one once, however. She lived in Nanaimo (yes some of them do live in Canada) and she was married to the MOST gorgeous man, and we couldn't understand what was wrong with her. He has since moved on and she has turned into a dried up old prune. Serves her right.

9:45 PM  
Blogger Dr. Deb said...

There is a subgroup of people who are quite disinterested in sex. Some of the research points to biological underpinnings and a host of psychological things. Good post. And May Day is a great day. One of my favorite months.

~Deb

7:53 AM  
Blogger dragonflyfilly said...

hey there Ian,
thanks for stopping by...OH YEAH!i have a lot of "dusting off" to do, heh heh...and i have a good supply of those sweet swiffer thingies...lol .. they "work a treat" !!!

well, back to my dusting...cheers,
pj

10:46 AM  
Blogger Lily said...

Hmm...science...classification...libido...sexuality...etc. Very complicated stuff.

My response to your post is quite simple: Thank goodness I'm not in the 1.05%. I imagine that would be oh-so-sad.

;)

1:11 PM  
Blogger dragonflyfilly said...

i don't get it? - why would it be sad...they probably don't even know what they are or are not missing...why do we always assume that our way is the best way?

hhmmmm, just wondering.....

8:40 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home